Is the World’s Population Undercounted by Over a Billion? New Study Suggests So
A groundbreaking new study suggests that global population figures might be significantly underestimated—by more than 1 billion people.
While the official global population is estimated at just over 8 billion, new research published in Nature Communications proposes that the actual number could be far higher. According to the study, rural populations—especially those in remote or conflict-affected regions—are routinely undercounted in official census data.
A Hidden Billion?
Projections have long estimated that the world population could reach 9 billion by 2037 and 10 billion by 2058. But the new study indicates we may already be much closer to those figures—if not beyond.
The research, led by Josias Láng-Ritter and a team from Aalto University, analyzed data from 307 dam projects across 35 countries. By comparing recorded resettlement figures following dam construction with actual demographic data, the team uncovered significant discrepancies.
In many cases, the number of people reported to have been relocated did not match up with the population estimates after resettlement. These mismatches pointed to a striking undercount: between 53% and 84% of individuals were missing from the post-relocation data.
“We have reason to believe there are significantly more than 8 billion people,” said Láng-Ritter. “Population estimates today are likely conservative.”
Why the Numbers May Be Off
The study highlights specific challenges when conducting accurate counts in rural or isolated areas. These include:
-
Difficult terrain or poor accessibility
-
Ongoing conflict or security concerns
-
Language barriers
-
Local resistance to census participation
As a result, entire communities may go officially “unrecorded,” meaning they’re absent from the numbers that drive global policies and development planning.
Real-World Impact
Population data is more than just a number—it drives critical decisions in public health, infrastructure, transportation, and humanitarian aid. If rural populations are systematically underrepresented, they may also be underserved.
“The impacts may be quite huge, because these datasets are used for very many different kinds of actions,” Láng-Ritter explained.
Correcting these discrepancies could lead to better policies and support for communities that have historically been overlooked.
A Call for More Inclusive Data
Ultimately, this research is about more than just numbers—it’s about visibility. Recognizing and accurately counting rural and displaced populations could not only reshape our understanding of the world’s demographics, but also help deliver resources and representation to those who need it most.
Please SHARE this story with your friends and family, and join the conversation in the comments below!
